- 編號：99243
- 書名：中國海事商事仲裁評論（第二輯）——國際仲裁的區域協同和實踐飯
- 作者：李虎
- 出版社：北大
- 出版時間：2024年12月
- 入庫時間：2025-4-11
- 定價：88
圖書內容簡介
本書是由中國海事仲裁委員會推出的專業文集。本書強調立足我國仲裁發展實際，充分展現我國仲裁的理論特色和實踐優勢，探討國際仲裁的發展趨勢和創新成果，為我國仲裁的進步提供參考思路。本書在借鑒國際先進經驗的基礎上，力爭為探索適合我國國情的仲裁發展道路貢獻力量。中國海事仲裁委員會通過開展海事商事仲裁理論研究、熱點追蹤，以及解讀相關法律法規和經典案例，致力于打造具有中國特色的、國際化、專業性仲裁法律文集，促進海事商事仲裁國際交流，不斷提升中國仲裁在業界的影響力與話語權，切實服務于國際貿易投資發展。
圖書目錄
"目錄
粵港澳大灣區民商事多元糾紛解決機制相關問題研究 001
一、非訴訟方面 003
二、訴訟方面 009
《仲裁法》修訂前沿問題探析 013
一、臨時仲裁制度尚存客觀瓶頸待突破 015
二、仲裁庭自裁管轄權制度修訂細節待商榷 022
三、臨時措施決定的執行效力問題有待解決 025
四、仲裁司法審查機制有待完善 032
結 語 039
仲裁司法審查中的價值選擇問題探析 040
一、問題的提出 040
二、仲裁協議效力司法審查的價值選擇 042
三、仲裁裁決司法審查的價值選擇 053
四、
仲裁司法審查價值選擇對有效銜接與協調多元化糾紛解決
機制的實際功用 058
結語 060
最密切聯系原則納入仲裁協議法律適用之證成 061
一、最密切聯系原則與涉外仲裁協議法律適用之淵源 063
二、“隱名”適用有效性原則下最密切聯系原則之新解 065
三、必要性：作為法律選擇理由的最密切聯系原則 068
四、可行性：最密切聯系原則與有效性原則“互動”之可能 072
結 語 074
第三方資助國際商事仲裁法律問題研究 075
引 言 075
一、第三方資助國際商事仲裁的內涵與發展 076
二、規制第三方資助國際商事仲裁的必要性 078
三、第三方資助國際商事仲裁的國際規制經驗探究 082
四、第三方資助國際商事仲裁在中國的發展路徑 085
結 論 091
東北亞仲裁發展觀察 092
中國篇 092
一、揚帆四海 093
二、改弦更張 093
三、創新與展望 095
俄羅斯篇 095
一、悠久的商事仲裁傳統 096
二、2015年仲裁改革的背景 097
三、現行俄羅斯仲裁法的主要特點 098
四、俄羅斯目前主要的商事仲裁機構 103
五、俄羅斯商事仲裁實踐中需要注意的幾個問題 105
蒙古國篇 110
一、介紹 110
二、現代蒙古國仲裁法與法律規制解決 113
三、修訂后的仲裁法 114
結 語 118
朝鮮篇 119
一、立法背景 120
二、主要內容 121
三、對于朝鮮仲裁管轄權的思考 127
四、《朝鮮涉外經濟仲裁法》存在的一些問題 131
結語 133
韓國篇 135
一、韓國仲裁產業政策導向及現狀 135
二、仲裁產業化導向下韓國仲裁法制建設 140
結語 149
日本篇 150
引言 150
一、日本司法機關對仲裁裁決進行司法審查的制度概要 153
二、日本司法機關對仲裁裁決進行司法審查的判例運用 161
結語 165
試論以集團公司名義訂立仲裁協議的效力擴張 166
一、基本案情 166
二、問題的提出 167
三、以集團公司名義訂立仲裁協議效力擴張的理論適用分析 169
四、我國以集團公司訂立仲裁協議效力擴張的法律制度完善 180
結 論 184
商事仲裁中逾期提交證據涉及的若干法律問題研究 185
一、研究逾期提交證據具有重要意義 186
二、“逾期提交證據”與“違反仲裁規則”的關系 188
三、逾期提交證據，與證據持有人故意隱瞞證據（及撤銷裁決
之間）的關聯性 193
四、對于仲裁庭擅自接受一方當事人逾期提交的證據，對方
當事人如何正確應對 195
五、關于逾期提交證據的立法建議 196
CONTENTS
Studies About Issues Related to the ADR Mechanism on Civil and
Commercial Disputes in the Guangdong-Hongkong-Macao Greater
Bay Area 201
Ⅰ. Non-litigation 204
Ⅱ. Litigation 215
An Analysis of Frontier Issues in the Amendment of Arbitration Law 220
Ⅰ. There are Objective Bottlenecks in the Ad Hoc Arbitration
System to be Broken Through 223
Ⅱ. The Details of the Revision of Competence-Competence Need
to be Discussed 235
Ⅲ. Unresolved Issue of Effectiveness of the Enforcement of
Decisions on Interim Measures 239
Ⅳ. The Judicial Review Mechanism for Arbitration Needs to be Improved 250
Conclusion 261
The Analysis of the Value Option for Judicial Review for Arbitration 262
Ⅰ. Formulation of the Question 263
Ⅱ. Value Options for Judicial Review of the Validity of Arbitration
Agreements 265
Ⅲ. Value Options for Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards 284
Ⅳ. Practical Utility of the Value Choice of Judicial Review of Arbitration for the Effective Articulation and Coordination of Diversified Dispute Resolution Mechanisms 293
Conclusion 296
The Choice of Law of the Arbitration Agreement: New Approach Towards
the Application of the Closest Connection Principle 297
Ⅰ. The Closest Connection Principle as a Source of Choice of
Law for Foreign-related Arbitration Agreements 300
Ⅱ. Noval Framework for Application of the Closest Connection
Principle Under the Hidden Pro-validation Approach 304
Ⅲ. Necessity: the Closest Connection Principle as Basis for Choice
of Laws 308
Ⅳ. Feasibility: Bridging the Validation Principle with the Closest Connection Principle 314
Conclusion 317
Study on the Legal Issues of the Third Party Funding for International Commercial Arbitration 318
Introduction 318
Ⅰ. The Connotation and Development of Third Party Funding for International Commercial Arbitration 319
Ⅱ. Necessity of Regulating Third Party Funding for International Commercial Arbitration 323
Ⅲ. Exploration of International Regulation Experience of Third
Party Funding for International Commercial Arbitration 328
Ⅳ. Development Path of Third Party Funded International
Commercial Arbitration in China 333
Conclusion 342
Observations on the Developments of Arbitration in Northeast Asia 344
China 345
Ⅰ. Worldwide Routes 345
Ⅱ. Setting the Sails 346
Ⅲ. Innovation and Outlook 348
Russia 348
Ⅰ. A Long Tradition of Commercial Arbitration 349
Ⅱ. Background of the 2015 Arbitration Reform 351
Ⅲ. Features of the Arbitration Law of Russian 353
Ⅳ. Current Main Commercial Arbitration Institutions in Russia 359
Ⅴ. Issues to be Noticed in the Practice of Commercial Arbitration
in Russia 363
Mongolia 369
Introduction 369
Ⅰ. Modern Mongolian Arbitration Law and Legal Regulation
Settlement 375
Ⅱ. The Revised Arbitration Law 376
Conclusion 382
Democratic People’s Republic of Korea 383
Ⅰ. Legislation Background 384
Ⅱ. Main Contents 385
Ⅲ. Reflections on the DPRK Jurisdiction of Arbitration 396
Ⅳ. Problems of the Foreign Economic Arbitration Law of the
DPRK 402
Conclusion 405
Republic of Korea 407
Ⅰ. Industrial Policy Orientation and Current Status of the Arbitration
of Republic of Korea 407
Ⅱ. Legal System Construction of Arbitration of Republic of Korea
Under the Orientation of Arbitration Industrialization 414
Conclusion 429
Japan 430
Introduction 430
Ⅰ. Summary of the Judicial Review System of Arbitral Awards by Japanese Judicial Organs 434
Ⅱ. The Application of Judicial Review in the Judicial Precedents
of Arbitral Awards by Japanese Judicial Organs 447
Conclusion 453
Study on the Expansion of the Validity of Arbitration Agreements
Concluded in the Name of a Group Company 455
Ⅰ. Basic Facts 456
Ⅱ. Problems Raised 457
Ⅲ. Analysis of the Application of Theory to the Expansion of the Validity of Arbitration Agreements Concluded in the Name of
a Group Company 459
Ⅳ. Improvement of the Legal System for the Expansion of the
Validity of Arbitration Agreements Concluded by Group
Company in China 477
Conclusion 483
Studies on the Production of Evidence After the Expiry of the Time Period
in Commercial Arbitration 484
Ⅰ. Significance of Studies on Production of Evidence After the
Expiry of the Time Period 485
Ⅱ. The Relationship Between “Producing Evidence After the Expiry
of the Time Period” and “ Violation of Arbitration Rules” 489
Ⅲ. The Connection Between the Evidence Produced After the Expiry
of the Time Period and the Deliberate Concealment of Evidence
by the Holder (and Setting Aside the Arbitration Award) 497
Ⅳ. How to Correctly Deal with the Arbitral Tribunal’s Arbitrary Admission to the Evidence Produced by the Other Party After
the Specified Time Period 499
Ⅴ. Legislative Proposals on Legal Issues concerning Evidence
Produced After the Expiry of the Time Period 501"
