[ 錢福臣 ]——(2013-7-29) / 已閱14313次
[3]Edited by Kermit L. Hall. By and For the People, Constitutional Rights in American History[J]. Harlan Davidson, inc. ,1991.
[4]David S. Elkind. State Action, Theories for Applying Constitutional Restrictions to Private Activity[J]. Columbia Law Review, 1974, May.
[5]Jan Smits. Private Law and Fundamental Rights: A Sceptical View[A]. Tom Barkhuysen and Siewert Lindenbergh(ed), Constitutionalisation of private Law[C]. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2006.
[6]Greg Taylor. Why the Common Law should be only Indirectly Affected by Constitutional Guarantees: A Comment on Stone[J]. Melbourne University Law Review, December, 2002.
[7]Ralf Brinktrine. The Horizontal Effect of Human Rights in German Constitutional Law: Debate on Horizontality and the Possible Role Model of the Germen "Mittelbare Drittwirkung Der Grundrechte"[J]. European Human Rights Review,2001.
[8]Megan M. Cooper. Dusting off tne Old Play Book: How the Supreme Court Disregarded the Bloom Trilogy，Returned to theories of the Past, and Found State Action througL Entwinement in Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Ass'n[J]. Creighton Law Review, 2002,(4).
[9]Ralph D. Mawdsley. The Supreme Court and Athletic Associations: A New State Action Theory[N]. West's Education Law Reporter, 2001-09-27.
[10]迪特爾·梅迪庫斯.德國民法總論，邵建東譯[M].北京：法律出版社，2001.
【原文出處】《求是學刊》2013年第1期
（作者單位：黑龍江大學法學理論與法制發(fā)展研究中心）
總共3頁 [1] [2] 3
上一頁
